Aldrich Law Firm, Ltd.Aldrich Law Firm, Ltd.2026-07-16T08:33:02Zhttps://www.johnaldrich-lawfirm.com/feed/atom/WordPress/wp-content/uploads/sites/1200649/2019/09/apple-touch-icon-75x75.pngOn Behalf of Aldrich Law Firm, Ltd.<![CDATA[Why a dash cam may be your car’s best investment]]>https://www.johnaldrich-lawfirm.com/?p=509432026-07-16T08:33:02Z2026-07-16T08:33:02ZWhat should you look for before buying one?
A useful dash cam does not need to be complicated, but it should include features that make the footage reliable. Before you buy, consider:
High-definition video that shows license plates and road signs
Night vision for crashes that happen after dark
A wide viewing angle that captures nearby lanes
Loop recording so that old footage is replaced automatically
Impact detection that saves crash footage from being erased
Enough storage or a reliable memory card
Secure mounting that does not block your view
You should also check local recording rules, especially if the device records sound. Proper placement and regular testing help ensure the camera works when needed.
How can you use footage in a claim?
After a crash, save the recording immediately and create a backup copy. Then:
Take photos of the vehicles, road and visible injuries
Exchange insurance information with the other driver
Report the crash to the police when required
Notify your insurer promptly
Provide the footage without editing it
Keep repair bills, medical records and related receipts
Dash cam footage can strengthen your version of events, but it should be supported by other evidence. When injuries or fault disputes make the claim complex, seeking experienced legal guidance may help you protect your rights and avoid costly mistakes as your legal case unfolds.]]>On Behalf of Aldrich Law Firm, Ltd.<![CDATA[What are the drawbacks of forming an LLC in Nevada?]]>https://www.johnaldrich-lawfirm.com/?p=509422026-07-06T19:08:45Z2026-07-06T19:08:45ZStarting a business is an exciting step, and a Nevada limited liability company often appeals to entrepreneurs because of its business friendly reputation. However, choosing where to form your company should involve more than comparing tax advantages or filing fees.
Before moving forward with business formation in Nevada, it is important to understand the potential drawbacks. Looking at the full picture can help you decide whether a Nevada limited liability company aligns with your business goals and day to day operations.
Higher startup and annual costs
Nevada requires more than just filing formation documents. Business owners must also pay for a state business license and annual compliance filings. These ongoing costs can be higher than those in many other states, making the overall expense of maintaining the business greater over time.
Operating in another state can increase compliance
If your business primarily operates outside Nevada, forming your company there may not eliminate obligations in your home state. You may still need to register as a foreign business where you conduct business, resulting in additional filing requirements, annual reports and state fees. Managing compliance in multiple states can become more complicated than expected.
Tax advantages may not apply to every business
Nevada does not impose a state income tax, but that does not automatically reduce every company's tax burden. Businesses are generally taxed where they conduct their operations. If your business activities occur elsewhere, you may still owe taxes in that state. Businesses with substantial Nevada revenue may also become subject to the Nevada Commerce Tax once they meet the required threshold.
Administrative responsibilities continue after formation
Forming the company is only the beginning. A Nevada limited liability company must maintain a registered agent with a physical Nevada address, keep required filings current and remain in good standing with the state. Missing these obligations can result in penalties or administrative issues that affect the business.Choosing where to establish your company should involve careful consideration of your business activities, future growth plans and compliance obligations. Seeking legal guidance before beginning business formation in Nevada can help you determine whether a Nevada limited liability company is the right choice for your specific circumstances.]]>On Behalf of Aldrich Law Firm, Ltd.<![CDATA[Why motorcycle accidents are often more severe than car crashes]]>https://www.johnaldrich-lawfirm.com/?p=509402026-06-21T12:43:07Z2026-06-21T12:43:07ZFrom cruising scenic roads to navigating busy streets, motorcycles offer a feeling of freedom that other vehicles can't match. As they travel on two wheels, riders enjoy an experience that is both practical and exhilarating.
But significant risks come with that freedom. When a collision occurs, a motorcyclist is far more likely to suffer serious injuries than occupants of passenger vehicles. Understanding the reasons behind that can help riders and drivers make safer choices on the road.
Less physical protection
Motorcycles lack the protection found in cars. Drivers and passengers have safety features such as seat belts, airbags, reinforced frames and crumple zones, which are designed to absorb the force of an impact. Motorcycles have none of these protections.In crashes, the rider's body is more likely to absorb much of the impact directly. Even with helmets and protective gear, riders are still vulnerable to severe injuries.In car accidents, occupants wearing seat belts are usually able to remain inside the vehicle. However, motorcyclists are often thrown from their bikes during a collision. After they are thrown, they may strike another vehicle, guardrails, the roadway or other objects. Secondary impacts can increase the severity of injuries and lead to long-term disabilities.One of the primary causes of motorcycle accidents is that drivers fail to notice riders. Inattentional blindness, which is the failure to notice something visible, occurs frequently, particularly at intersections and during lane changes.Motorcycle accident victims often face lengthy recoveries involving surgeries, rehabilitation and time away from work. The costs associated with medical care and future treatments can quickly become overwhelming, especially when there is no income to cover them and other living expenses.If you were injured in a motorcycle accident, Nevada's comparative negligence rule means that you may still receive compensation, as long as you were not more than 50% responsible for the accident. However, any compensation may be reduced by your percentage of fault.Insurance companies often try to shift blame onto motorcyclists, which means you need someone fighting for your rights. A legal professional can gather and present evidence on your behalf. With their help, you have a better chance of recovering the compensation you deserve.
]]>On Behalf of Aldrich Law Firm, Ltd.<![CDATA[Technology may make drivers worse]]>https://www.johnaldrich-lawfirm.com/?p=509392026-06-10T16:46:48Z2026-06-10T16:46:48ZA lot of current auto technology is designed to help drivers operate their vehicles safely and effectively, and it certainly does do that in some cases. A blind-spot monitor may alert a driver to a nearby vehicle so that they do not merge into it and cause a collision, for example. An automatic braking system may help a driver stop their car before a rear-end accident. A backup camera helps in parking lots.
However, there is also some evidence that technology is making drivers worse. Serious auto accidents have not notably decreased, despite a rapid increase in technology, suggesting that the issue may lie with the drivers themselves.
Distraction behind the wheel
One potential issue is that the technology is distracting for drivers. They spend a lot of their mental energy interacting with technological systems inside the car. There are screens, alerts, flashing lights, warning chimes and much else that can take a driver's attention away from simply operating their vehicle.
Reliance on technology
Additionally, when drivers start to rely on technology, it can sometimes make them complacent. A driver may so fully trust the automated systems in their vehicle to avoid an accident that they do not pay as close attention to the road and do not focus on safety themselves. This can lead to accidents caused by avoidable mistakes—such as a driver with an automatic braking system who constantly tailgates.
Do you deserve financial compensation?
Technology is a major part of modern automobiles, even if it can increase the odds of an accident. If you have been injured in a crash caused by another driver, you may deserve compensation for medical bills, lost wages, pain and suffering and more.
]]>On Behalf of Aldrich Law Firm, Ltd.<![CDATA[Do Nevada pedestrians automatically have the right of way?]]>https://www.johnaldrich-lawfirm.com/?p=509382026-05-25T20:22:37Z2026-05-25T20:22:37ZPedestrians in crosswalks have the right of way
Provided that they follow traffic signs and lights, pedestrians can confidently cross at crosswalks. So long as they wait for the light to change at a marked location, they have the right of way. Any approaching vehicles should yield to them.
The same is not true for those crossing elsewhere on a road. The law requires that a pedestrian yield the right of way to approaching vehicles if they cross anywhere other than a marked crosswalk. Even when pedestrians do their best to follow traffic laws, unpredictable and aggressive conduct by drivers could result in major pedestrian collisions.
Thankfully, pedestrians can still seek compensation when they are partially at fault for a traffic incident. Under modified comparative fault rules, pedestrians who are 50% or less at fault for a collision can still take legal action against a driver.
Validating who was at fault is a key component of any successful insurance claim or personal injury lawsuit. An attorney familiar with Nevada traffic statutes and car crash injury claims can help pedestrians review a police report to understand their options after a crash.]]>On Behalf of Aldrich Law Firm, Ltd.<![CDATA[Understanding the one bite rule in dog bite cases]]>https://www.johnaldrich-lawfirm.com/?p=509372026-05-14T17:16:42Z2026-05-14T17:15:11ZDog bite incidents can lead to painful injuries, medical expenses and emotional stress. In many cases, victims wonder whether a dog owner can be held responsible if the animal has never bitten anyone before.
Nevada uses the one-bite rule to determine liability in dog bite cases. It focuses on whether the owner knew or should have known that the animal had dangerous tendencies before the attack occurred.
What the one bite rule means
The one bite rule does not literally mean a dog gets one free attack without consequences. Instead, it refers to the idea that liability often depends on prior knowledge of aggressive behavior.If an owner knew the dog had shown signs of aggression such as growling, lunging or previous attacks, they may be held responsible for injuries caused later.
How dangerous behavior is proven
Prior bites are not the only way to show that a dog may be dangerous. Complaints from neighbors, warnings from the owner or aggressive conduct toward people or other animals may also support a claim.
Why evidence matters after an attack
Medical records, photographs, witness statements and animal control reports can all help establish what happened during the incident. Evidence showing prior aggressive behavior may also support compensation.Taking quick action after a dog bite can help preserve important details that may later support a claim.
Understanding your legal options
Dog bite laws may hold an owner responsible if they knew or should have known that their dog had aggressive or dangerous tendencies before the attack occurred. The courts often examine prior behavior, warnings and the specific facts surrounding the incident when determining liability.Seeking prompt and professional legal guidance can help you evaluate liability, gather evidence and better understand the legal process after a dog bite incident.]]>On Behalf of Aldrich Law Firm, Ltd.<![CDATA[Vehicle issues are a leading cause of semi-truck crashes]]>https://www.johnaldrich-lawfirm.com/?p=509352026-04-25T21:52:40Z2026-04-25T21:52:40Zprovides statistical information about the underlying cause of wrecks.
Mistakes by drivers, inadequate surveillance and non-performance due to falling asleep or experiencing a medical emergency are among the top causes of semi-truck collisions. The FMCSA also recognizes issues with a vehicle as a top cause of collisions.
What vehicle issues cause wrecks?
Approximately one-tenth of the commercial crashes evaluated occurred due to an issue with the commercial vehicle. In some cases, maintenance concerns or improperly-performed repairs are to blame for semi-truck collisions. If brakes fail or steering becomes unresponsive, truck drivers may not be able to maneuver as they need to for safety in traffic.
Other times, there may be defects in vehicle components that suddenly fail. Finally, improperly-loaded cargo can result in a driver losing control. Each of these unique scenarios might lead to a business being liable for the incident.
Trucking companies or service providers might be liable for crashes caused by improper or delayed maintenance. Manufacturers might be reliable for defective parts that cause crashes. Clients might be responsible for improperly loading a semi-truck.
Reviewing what occurred before and during a semi-truck crash with a skilled legal team can help injured people understand their rights. A complicated commercial insurance claim or personal injury lawsuit may be necessary to recover collision expenses if a business is ultimately at fault for a crash.]]>On Behalf of Aldrich Law Firm, Ltd.<![CDATA[How can limiting left turns improve driving safety?]]>https://www.johnaldrich-lawfirm.com/?p=509342026-04-15T04:09:22Z2026-04-15T04:09:22Zlimiting left turns for over two decades. You might still see a UPS truck make a left turn. However, the software they install in their vehicles guides drivers on routes that limit or avoid left turns
Not traveling across the flow of oncoming traffic
The problem with left turns is that they force a vehicle to move across the flow of oncoming traffic, and that creates a point of increased risk. If you or one of the oncoming drivers misjudges the speed of the other, then a collision is a real possibility. A crash could also occur if the left-turning vehicle loses power midway across, as the oncoming vehicles might not be able to slow in time to avoid hitting them.
You might need to drive a little further if you eliminate left turns, and with the current price of gas, you may want to keep every trip as efficient as possible. What UPS found is that minimizing left turns was actually more efficient, as waiting for a gap in the oncoming traffic so you can turn left burns through both gas and time.
Getting hit by an oncoming vehicle would have serious costs and consequences. Anyone injured in a collision should consider legal guidance to explore their options for compensation.]]>On Behalf of Aldrich Law Firm, Ltd.<![CDATA[3 critical forms of evidence in a slip-and-fall case]]>https://www.johnaldrich-lawfirm.com/?p=509322026-03-28T19:19:49Z2026-03-28T19:19:49Zcan constitute negligence.
When people slip and fall at a business, they sometimes make the mistake of failing to preserve adequate evidence, leaving them at a disadvantage if they take legal action to get compensation later. The three types of evidence below can all play a major role in a successful slip-and-fall claim.
1. Proof of unsafe circumstances
Using a cellphone to take pictures or record video footage of slipping or tripping hazards can preserve proof that the property was not appropriately safe for visitors. Workers may eventually clean spills or move tripping hazards, making immediate documentation critical to proving that the premises were unsafe.
2. A report filed at the business
Incident reports help validate that someone fell at a business. Notifying a manager about the incident before leaving the business helps ensure there is an internal record of the event to prove that it occurred.
3. Medical documentation
Slip-and-falls are not actionable unless they cause actual economic losses. Seeing a doctor the same day as a slip-and-fall incident can help prove that the fall caused an individual's injuries. Medical records can provide needed evidence and also support claims for damages related to current and future medical expenses and lost income.
Reviewing this evidence and the details of the fall with a premises liability attorney can help those hurt in a slip-and-fall understand their options. With the right assistance and evidence, they may be able to recover some of their losses.]]>On Behalf of Aldrich Law Firm, Ltd.<![CDATA[Addressing a business partner’s self-dealing]]>https://www.johnaldrich-lawfirm.com/?p=509312026-03-14T21:06:21Z2026-03-14T21:06:21ZSelf-dealing is a breach of duty
Self-dealing occurs when someone in a position to make decisions on behalf of an organization offers opportunities to themselves for the sake of personal profit. A commercial property owner who just started a new partnership might choose to lease a unit in the building they own, possibly at above-market rates, for example.
Technically, self-dealing is generally a violation of federal law. Even in cases where prosecution isn't necessary, evidence of self-dealing can be adequate grounds for one partner to pursue a lawsuit against the other.
They can seek compensation for the economic harm caused by self-dealing. They can also seek to compel their partner to either buy them out or agree to a buyout where they give up their interest in the company.
Evaluating evidence of self-dealing with a legal professional familiar with the challenges of business litigation can help partners fully understand their options. Financial records, contracts and other evidence of self-dealing can facilitate a successful request for compensation or buyout.]]>